Friday, April 08, 2005

Mitch Alborn is a Liar

But you already knew that, right?

He's the sports columnist who wrote the treacly, somewhat embarrassing death memoir "Tuesdays with Morrie." It's about an old teacher he reconnected with, a free spirit named Morrie, who was dying. Mitch would visit him every Tuesday and learn valuable life lessons, life lessons that he apparently had never heard before, like "stop and smell the roses" or "how the courage to face the unknown with a smile" or "sometimes, when you get old and you're sick, you can't wipe yourself after doing #2, and someone has to do that for you, and it's kind of embarrassing".

And then Mitch wrote a book capitalizing on his friend's death. And it became a big best-seller, and he wrote some more books, and now this douchebag's a best-selling author. They even made a TV movie out of Tuesdays with Morrie, which would contain the final performance from the legendary Jack Lemmon, who really didn't deserve to go out that way. The basic theme of this story, as best I can recall, is the following: Death's really poignant provided it happens to someone else.

If it happens to you, though, it's less poignant and more, oh yeah, unpleasant and painful.

Alborn wrote another book after Morrie which I haven't read. It's called The Five People You Meet in Heaven. It's about an old man, Eddie, who dies saving a young girl at an amusement park and goes to Heaven. When he gets there, he discovers that Heaven's not really a place with clouds and angels and harps. It looks a lot like where you spent your life, and you meet people you knew when you were alive, and they tell you stuff about yourself.

Sounds like a riveting read, I know. I'm betting the final person Eddie meets in Heaven is the young girl he saved. Either that, or he meets Morrie, in an odd book-crossover technique that will really give the marketing department a much-needed boost. They made a bullshit movie out of this book as well, starring Jon Voight. Alborn's started this kind of TV-movie cottage industry. You find old actors who don't get much work any more and have them elaborately die on screen for two hours. Then you sit back and watch that advertising and DVD money roll in.

So, you might think this is why I've called Alborn a liar. Because he sugarcoats death, inserts deep meaning into situations that lack meaning, and pretends there's a Heaven, which there clearly is not.

But, no, the guy's just a liar.

Detroit Free Press columnist Mitch Albom wrote a bogus basketball column. Based on earlier interviews of two NBA players, he submitted a Friday piece about a Saturday event (as if it happened) for the Sunday edition. The game was up when the two players mentioned in the article failed to show.

Oops. This is why you shouldn't write a column about a basketball game before it has actually happened.

Now, yeah, yeah, I know...Mitch was under time pressure from his editor's and it was for the Sunday edition. And he was, like, super-tired. But come on! Why bother reading the sports page at all, if they're just going to make up what happens before the games are even played? Hell, I could do that. Why doesn't the Detroit Free Press give me some column inches?

This is an egregious ethical lapse. Prophesying the future should be clearly labeled as such. Columnists do not fabricate events or characters and pawn them off as truth. His sports column in question was not satire. Mitch Albom, a long time award winner and best-selling author, should understand these essential ethics better than most.

Mitch, and any professional journalist, should clearly understand why this was not appropriate behavior. I kind of think "ethical lapse" is too kind for this scenario. This is more like being exposed as a fraud.

It also explains why Mitch enjoys writing about the dead so much. They can't voice a rebuttal when he just starts making shit up about them.

18 comments:

Lons said...

Of COURSE there's a Heaven, Anony...And also, there's totally a Santa Clause and a Neverland and unicorns and kindly gnomes who fix your shoes while you're sleeping. Don't you let anyone tell you any different.

Anonymous said...

the problem is that you cannot prove their is not a heaven while I can prove that Santa, Neverland, unicorns and gnomes are fictional.


ps: yes mitch alborn is a liar.

Lons said...

First, spelling...What you mean it, I cannot prove THERE is not a Heaven. And of course I can...Heaven is said to be floating in the clouds above Earth, right? Well, I've been up there in airplanes and I've seen satellite imagery and there's no Heaven.

Your entire thesis doesn't work. You can't prove whether or not there is a Heaven scientifically anyway. It's a matter of faith, and I think your faith is stupid, just like I would think someone who had faith in trolls and imps and elves was stupid. Deal with it.

Anonymous said...

read the five people you meet in heaven before you slag it... you might actually enjoy it.

Lons said...

No and no. I won't read it, and I wouldn't enjoy it even if I did. It's pap.

This entire "you can't know anything about it until you read it yourself" theory is nonsense. Have you read all of the Curious George books? If I gave you one, wouldn't you get the gist of it without actually flipping through the whole thing? Mitch isn't writing anything more challenging.

Anonymous said...

Yes there is a heaven. And none of you are douchebags. There is a God who loves you. Darkness is only the absence of light. Stop being so angry for a second and smell the roses.

GC

Lons said...

KS, I could kiss you. Seriously. As long as I have a blog, there will never be anyone who so perfectly illustrates the blatant hypocracy and silliness of Internet trolls.

You tell me to keep my opinions to myself EVEN AS YOU OFFER AN OPINION ABOUT MY BLOG POST. Why is your opinion on this issue more valuable than mine? Why is it acceptable for you to voice your opinion forcefully on my blog, but it's not acceptable for me, the owner and proprietor of the blog, to do so? Don't you realize how silly that sounds?

Also, you missed my point about the "Curious George" books COMPLETELY. I simply meant that you don't have to read all those books to know that they're not valuable to you. Reading a part of one is enough. These dopey faux-spiritual bestsellers are exactly the same.

(In fact, there isn't much difference between them and children's literature save the illustrations.)

Anonymous said...

This article is a lie! I suppose that you've read Tuesdays with Morrie; and watched the film? I personally feel this is one of the most moving stories, coming from an amazing man! Do you feel jealous, because he was so amazing? That he could feel the meaning? And Mitch, rather than being slagged off as a liar, should be hailed as a hero for penning Morrie's words to paper. I'm not saying writing an article before a game was right, but this doesn't make his books any less than they are. How do you know there isn't a heaven? How do you know there is? It's called FAITH. And maybe if you took some time out of your self obsessed lives to actually think about someone else and their passion, their belief that love is the strongest solvent, maybe you would all be better people, and the world would be a better place.

Don't disrespect a pupil of a great man. And before you know this guy well, don't call him a liar. Judging twat.

Anonymous said...

Cynicism is often necessary. Being an ignorant twat, however, is optional. Why, then, choose that option? Pathetic little keyboard warrior who has all the answers.

As is the trouble with most atheists (I presume you're an atheist given your comments), you have a serious chip on your shoulder about something. Many would hazard a guess that it's a sever lack of genital fortitude, but I won't make that assumption. Suffice to say, the hypocricy that gushes forth from every orifice and into your blog is particularly unpalatable. It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic.

Anonymous said...

"The basic theme of this story, as best I can recall, is the following: Death's really poignant provided it happens to someone else." - Wrong, the theme of the story is the importance of love. Before you call someone else a liar get your own facts straight.

"and now this douchebag's a best-selling author." I'm sure you could find a more articulate description regardless of your personal feelings

Anonymous said...

You're the tard here...."Five People" is a pretty damn touching book. It's a nice contrast from the whiny snarkfest crap you post on your blog.

Anonymous said...

Stupid criticizer, who are you to say such things? Give some respect dude!

Anonymous said...

ENGOT!

ace said...

I could not agree more. AlBomb is a fraud! He is proven to be a liar but nobody care. He is not even a Detroit product. By the way, does anyone notice his show is sponsored not by GM, not by CHEVY, not byFORD, not by DODGE or CHRYSLER...by TOYOTA!!!Not only that he halks Toyota all show long!!! While sitting in the studios of the Great Voice of The Great Lakes...WJR. Step up fellow UAW members.WTF!!!

Elisabeth Page said...

Anonymous said... there is a heaven and you're a douchebag

Anonymous - I think you'll find that both of those opinions are subjective ;)

Anonymous said...

Lol, you spelled "Albom" wrong.

Anonymous said...

Ummm...you may want to find out the correct spelling of the person's name before you write an article about them. His name is ALBOM, not ALBORN.

Why would anyone take anything you say about this man seriously when you don't even know his name? You misspelled it in every instance so don't try saying it was a typo.

He may very well be a fraud of an author, but I think you've proven that the very same can be said about you.

cindy said...

I listen to Albom's radio show for the pure agony of it, it is like watching a person get up in front of the class and give a speech, where they completely go into melt down due to anxiety. I hate Albom. I think he is a phony, who portrays himself as a nice guy, man of the people, who thinks he has an insight into the soul or human condition. But he is a jerk, with a big ego and his books are horrible and he is a horrible person who takes advantage of situations and then writes about it for his gain. He cannot write a book about anything but someone who is sick, dead or dying.
And the ironic thing about it is, he is considered "a good writer", by whom? People that read at an 8th grade level and are full grown adults?