Saturday, August 20, 2005

The Ring Two

I thought Verbinksi's American Ring was way better than Hideo Nakata's original Japanese version, Ringu. Nakata, well, he's just not very good. He makes dull, dreary, uninteresting movies that happen to have great premises.

His original Ringu had a solid concept, and it was an okay movie, but it just kind of plodded along, without building much momentum. The imagery was there - washed-out visuals, creepy undead wet girl, black oily water, deadpan dialogue, nondescript urban settings - but the narrative was dead in the water. Which brings us to his Japanese follow-up, Dark Water (remade earlier this year with Jennifer Connelly). The movie was not only intensely similar to Ringu, but even less interesting, another waste of a solid set-up.



Now Nakata has come to America, and it's just getting worse and worse...The script for Ring Two was written by Ehren Krueger, who wrote the first American Ring, and it's loosely based on the Japanese Ringu sequels. Anyway, it's totally nonsensically bad. It takes one of the main assets of the first film - the strong central concept of a video tape that causes death a week after it's viewed - and ditches it in favor of some lame child-possession plot line.

In the first act of the new film, Rachel (Naomi Watts), the plucky reporter who first discovered the secret of the deadly video tape, destroys the only known copy, thus ending the evil ghost Samara's reign of terror.

Why shoot yourself in the foot like that? For the next hour or so, the film essentially has no story at all, nowhere to go. Ghostly things continue happening to Rachel and her oddball, quiet son Aidan (David Dorfman) for no reason. Cause the tape is destroyed, right? So the ghost has no power, right?

We know eventually all will be explained, but the whole affair seems rather pointless. If the ghost isn't imprisoned in the tape, if she can fly all around haunting whomever she pleases, whether or not they've even watched her little home movie, then there are no rules, no objectives, no conflict. You've got a story that makes no sense.

Eventually, we find out that the undead Samara wants to invade the body of young Adian and live on with Rachel as her mommy. Uh-huh...If she could possess people, why hasn't she been doing that all along? And why would she want Rachel for her mommy if Rachel just keeps trying to kill her? And if you had this kind of power over time and space, would you really use it to spook horny teenagers, precocious 8 year olds and their attractive, fragile and emotionally distant single mothers?

So, the set-up is fuck-all. Nakata is left with are a bunch of scenarios that play like a best-of of the first movie, recreations of the original Ring's best moments.

While the first movie had an intense encounter with a crazed horse on a ferry, this new movie has a ludicrous and poorly-handled sequence in which a large group of deer attack Rachel's car. (It's even sillier than it sounds, and the CG deer effects are atrocious).

While the first movie had an informational encounter with Samara's crazed father (Brian Cox), the new movie has an informational encounter with Samara's crazed mother (Sissy Spacek).

While the first movie had a bland boyfriend killed off in the film's only gruesome sequence...well, you get the idea.

But let's face it...what's enjoyable about Gore Verbinski's original film isn't the crackerjack plotting. It's the style. The movie is unsettling (if not actually scary). It's aided by crisp blue-black cinemtography, tight plotting, a coolly efficient performance from Naomi Watts and a genuinely surprising late-in-the-film twist.

Ring Two is a film lacking style. By the half-hour point, the film has become so ridiculous that it never again gets close to being at all chilling. Almost all of the attempts at scare scenes, in fact, rely on poor computer effects, including an odd sequence in which bathtub water defies gravity to rest against the ceiling. The technology, regrettably, isn't quite up to the task, and the result is a garbled and ill-defined liquidy mass. Not scary.

Nakata right now is publicly vying for the chance to try again with Ring Three. I think his sequel has pretty much killed the series, honestly. If they are going to try and keep this think afloat (har!), some poor screenwriter's going to have to work overtime to make anything work with this hackneyed mythology. Best of luck, DreamWorks...

4 comments:

Horsey said...

The only horror pictures I like are zombie movies, alien movies, and creature movies. Anything to do with ghosts, and revenants and what not, bores me. They don't even adhere to the laws of their own universes half the time. And he victims always seem to do the most illogical thing possible at every juncture. Oh I'm being chased by a vengeful spirit? Well let me take refuge in this barn full of hanging knives, because just walking on the street with tons of people around is just not safe.

Lons said...

The "western encroachment on Japanese life" theme definitely plays out in "Ringu," but I actually thought itw as a bit clumsy. I agree the Verbinski version eliminates that kind of cultural critique, but it works SO MUCH better as a horror film. For me, anyway.

I have seen and enjoyed "Cure," though again I found it more intriguing than gripping or scary. (In terms of pure freaky fucked-up gothic horror atmosphere, my favorite Asian horror of recent memory is Korea's "Tale of Two Sisters").

Haven't seen "Pulse," but we have it at the store, and I always mean to rent it. Once I'm done with some of these laserdiscs...

Anonymous said...

I'm currently trying to review the whole Ring Cycle on my blog, but briefly, I think the main problem with Ring Two is that Nakata's told this story too many times now (four in total, if you include the very similar Dark Water). He's getting bored and sloppy, so the old mythology he re-uses looks tired and the new stuff seems half-assed and illogical. I still think the original Ringu is peerless, but I think given the nature of the story, its ending and the ticking clock dynamic, it's not really a film that demands a sequel, let alone a franchise.

Has anyone read the novels? They give a very different (frankly, duller) take on the story.

Anonymous said...

i personally think zombie/alien movies are worse... well alien ones are okay but zombies? no, there is really no decent zombie movie around... they're all the same... out to take over the world. some ghost movies are okay. yes, ring 2 was terrible, i agree, but there are some decent ones.